Skip to content

Tax Crimes – The Fight Goes Digital

4 April 2017
by Guest author

Melissa Dejong, OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration

Tax has been a high profile topic in recent years. People may often think of large scale tax avoidance by huge multinationals – which the OECD has estimated at between USD 100 – 240 billion in lost revenue annually. However, tax evasion and fraud goes on every day, and may be happening right in your local restaurant, bar, grocery store or hairdresser.

In the digital world, every day tax evasion can be facilitated even more, with taxpayers using readily available technology to evade tax. Previously, tax evasion in small businesses could be undertaken simply by accepting cash under the table, or keeping a separate set of books.

Now, the same outcomes can be achieved even more efficiently, using software such as “zappers” and “phantomware.” Zappers physically prevent sales appearing on the records. Phantomware creates virtual sales terminals for the same purpose. Both allow businesses to selectively delete or reduce their sales figures, without leaving a trace of any alteration. The taxpayer reports lower sales and lower taxable income, all the while retaining the actual profit. This type of evasion and fraud (called “electronic sales suppression”) makes it hard for tax authorities to detect any discrepancies. These types of tax evasion technologies are also now becoming available over the internet – which can make it harder for tax authorities to control and penalise.

Not only that, but taxpayers can also evade tax by over-reporting their deductions. This can occur by creating false invoices that look genuine, but where no outgoings have actually been paid. This fraudulently reduces taxable income, causing substantial revenue losses to the government. For example, in the Slovak Republic, during the years 2014 and 2015 the amount of risky VAT detected in domestic invoicing fraud was more than half a billion euro.

Tax authorities also face challenges in the online sharing economy, through ride-sharing or home-sharing online marketplaces. These online sharing platforms – which are of course legal – can generate taxable income for taxpayers, but which may not be reported and stay under the radar of the tax authority.

However, tax authorities are catching up.

The OECD’s new report Technology Tools to Tackle Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud shows how technology is being used by tax administrations around the world as a powerful tool to swiftly identify and tackle tax evasion and tax fraud. The report details countries’ technical experience and revenue successes from implementing technology tools, particularly to counter electronic sales suppression and false invoicing.

It demonstrates how easy and effective these technology tools can be. For example, a number of technology solutions to combat electronic sales suppression are available, which can include a tamper-proof black box installed in point of sales machines as well as real-time transaction reporting to the tax authority. The results are impressive, such as:

  • Sweden has experienced increased tax revenue by EUR 300 million per annum.
  • Mexico brought 4.2 million micro businesses into the formal economy as a result of e-invoicing.
  • Rwanda saw a VAT increase of 20% within two years of introducing its solution.
  • Hungary saw VAT revenue increase by 15% in the first year of operation, which more than covered the implementation costs.
  • In Quebec in Canada, not only was substantial revenue recovered, but the solution also increased the efficiency for the tax authority to conduct audits, with the number of inspections being increased from 120 to 8000 per year.

The report also shares successes in using technology to tackle false invoicing. Countries have already shown that using electronic invoicing solutions can prevent and reduce tax evasion, such as where invoices can be verified as authentic using digital signatures and online verification tools. It can also make tax compliance easier for businesses where electronic documentation can replace paper-based audits or reporting obligations.

Finally, the report describes the emerging tools tax authorities are using to detect online business activity, and notes that this is likely to be a growing area for tax authorities in the digital world.

As well as detailing the technical features of these solutions, the report also explains best practices for effectively implementing these solutions. By sharing these successes and best practices, it is hoped that other tax authorities can leverage this information and give consideration to how they might quickly implement similar solutions. Not only can this mean more revenue for public services, but it has a preventative and deterrent effect, and levels the playing field for compliant businesses that have already been paying their fair share of taxes.

This report is part of an ongoing series of reports on tax and technology, which is produced by the OECD’s Task Force on Tax Crime and Other Crimes. The Task Force furthers the work of the Oslo Dialogue, which promotes a whole of government approach to fighting tax crimes and illicit flows.

Useful links

OECD work on tax and crime

OECD reports on tax and crime

One Response
  1. Charles Kovacs permalink
    April 5, 2017

    This was a very useful article except for the mention of tax avoidance at the beginning of the first paragraph. Tax avoidance is legal, it just means paying the least amount of taxes required by law. This is arguably a corporate duty to the owners/shareholders, as is the payment of all tax obligations required by law. Tax laws are complicated, even for small companies operating in just one country, and much more so for large MNC’s operating globally. Complicated and/or vague tax codes create possibilities for tax avoidance. The solution to tax avoidance is to simplify the tax codes to enforce reasonable tax rates.

Comments are closed.